Quantcast
Viewing all 353 articles
Browse latest View live

Charles Town attorney accused of malpractice

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
jmcassell.jpg

Cassell

CHARLES TOWN – A Jefferson County attorney is accused of negligence in pursing a New York City man’s lawsuit against Shepherdstown officials, including bailing out on him while it was still pending.

J. Michael Cassell is named as a co-defendant in a legal malpractice suit filed by William C. Struna in Jefferson Circuit Court. In his suit filed July 26, Struna, 66, alleges Cassell, 60, of Charles Town, caused him to lose his suit against the town’s former mayor, planning commission and historic landmark commission when a judge dismissed it on the grounds it was filed before all administrative appeals had been exhausted.

According to the suit, Struna hired Cassell, who at the time was with the Leesburg, Va. firm of Campbell Miller Zimmerman, which is also named as a co-defendant, to help him contest the town’s requirement he obtain a building permit to install new windows at the house he owns on 107 West New Street. In the lawsuit he would eventually file on Nov. 6, 2009, Struna alleges the dispute stemmed from an altercation that occurred between he and then-Mayor Lance Dom three years before.

On an unspecified date, Struna warned Dom about parking his vehicle on in the alleyway adjacent to the West New Street property. Should he not heed the warning, Struna threatened to have his car towed.

Sometime thereafter, Struna went to town hall to inquire if a building permit was needed to replace the windows in the house. Both the town clerk, Amy Boyd, and the town’s zoning administrator, who is not indentified in the suit, said so long as the new windows were the same color and configuration as the old ones, a permit was not necessary.

According to the suit, upon learning that they wanted to replace windows in the property, Dom, in retaliation for the altercation, ordered the zoning commissioner to inform Struna he would need a building permit to replace the windows. At its Jan. 15, 2007 meeting, the planning commission denied Struna’s permit to replace the windows.

At the time, Dom was a commission member.

Records show Cassell on May 8, 2008 filed suit against Dom, and the planning commission challenging the commission’s denial of his permit. In his suit, he maintained the section of the code they cited spoke only vaguely to the issue in Struna’s case.

Judge Thomas J. Steptoe Jr. in July 2008 dismissed part of the suit on the grounds an appeal to the town’s board of zoning appeals had not been made. The remainder of the suit was dismissed on April 30, 2009.
Two months after Steptoe dismissed his suit, Struna applied for a second permit to replace the windows so the home could be properly insulated for the winter. At its Aug. 10 meeting, the town’s historic landmark commission took issue with Struna’s argument to replace the windows citing studies showing that modern windows do not provide better energy efficiency, and do not increase resale value.

Also, the commission discussed unspecified issues with Struna’s failure to upkeep his property. Until that time, he had never been cited for any municipal violation.

The landmark commission on Sept. 15, 2009, recommended the planning commission deny Struna’s permit which it did at its meeting a week later.

The second suit named the planning and historic landmark commissions and Dom as co-defendants. The suit was removed to U.S. District Court a month later.

Records show on Aug. 6, 2010, Judge John Preston Bailey granted a motion to dismiss Dom and the planning commission from the suit on the grounds Dom had not been served with a summons within 120 days from when the complaint was filed, and the claims made against the commission stemming from the first building permit denial were time-barred. In his order, Bailey made note that “No response to any of the motions has been filed by the plaintiff.”

Thirteen days later, Cassell made a motion to withdraw as counsel citing, among other things, his inability to “communicate in an effective and cooperative manner” with Struna. Bailey granted the motion five days later.

Two months later, Martinsburg attorney Susanne Thompson filed a notice of appearance on Struna’s behalf.

By the time he withdrew, the firm changed its name to Campbell Flannery. According to the Secretary of State’s Website, the firm first started doing business in West Virginia in 2005.
Currently, not only does it still operate under the name Campbell Miller Zimmerman, but it also lists Cassell as its agent for service of process despite him beginning a partnership with Robin Skinner Prinz on Nov. 9.

Records show on March 9, 2011, Bailey dismissed the suit citing, among other things, Struna’s failure to also appeal the second building permit denial to the board of zoning appeals. Also, Bailey on July 20 denied Struna’s motion to reopen the case based on a supposed new discovery that the town’s building code was never promulgated.

In his current suit, Struna alleges Cassell’s “overall handling of the case demonstrates an inattention and lack of reasonable diligence in relation to a legal matter.” As a result of both Cassell’s and Campbell Flannery’s negligence, Struna alleges he’s incurred a “loss of economic advantage and past and future emotional suffering and loss.”

Struna seeks unspecified damages, court costs, interest and attorneys fees. He is represented by Lewisburg attorney Robert J. Frank.

The case is assigned to Judge David Saunders.

Jefferson Circuit Court case numbers 12-C-279 (Struna legal malpractice), 09-C-429 (Struna permit appeal II) 08-C-195 (Struna permit appeal I); U.S. District for the Northern District of West Virginia, case number, 09-cv-77(Struna permit appeal removal)


CIVIL FILINGS: Jefferson County

Aug. 28
Jennifer Schrembs vs. West Virginia University Hospitals East Inc., Charles Town General Hospital d/b/a Jefferson Memorial Hospital and Ronald Bruce Low, MD and Thanigasalam Arumuganthan
PA-Christopher T. Nace; J-David Sanders
* Plaintiff says that on Nov. 18, 2007, she went to Jefferson’s Emergency Room with a large amount of vaginal bleeding. Defendant Low was the ER doctor who, she claims, negligently failed to perform proper treatment. She returned for two different dilatation & curettage (D&C) procedures and then a complete hysterectomy. Plaintiff alleges failure of doctors and hospital to avoid damage to urinary system as her bladder was cut during surgery which led to further hospitalization and surgery.
Case number: 12-C-337

Aug. 31
James Ott and Dottie Ott vs. Fresenius Medical Care North America Holdings Limited Partnership, Fresenius Medical Care HIMG Dialysis Center, LLC and Bio-Medical Application of West Virginia, Inc., d/b/a Bio-Medical Application of Martinsburg d/b/a Fresenus Medical Care of Charles Town
PA-Christopher Nace; J-David Sanders
* Plaintiff says that on Feb. 13, 2009, a catheter was inserted during dialysis. In May 2009, plaintiff went on a “cycler” developed by the defendant. Plaintiff alleges in June 2009, he contracted peritonitis. In Sept. 2009, apparatus was removed for malfunction. A Sept. 8, 2010, recall has plaintiff alleging a design defect, manufacturer’s defect, negligence, breach of warranties and failure to warn of dangers. Plaintiff seeks judgment to be determined at trial.
Case number: 12-C-343

Sept. 4
Branch Banking & Trust Company vs. Jason Gresczyk
PA-Ryan Marsteller; J-David Sanders
* Plaintiff alleges defendant owes at least $83,741.69 for past due credit agreement.
Case number: 12-C-346

CIVIL FILINGS: Jefferson County

Oct. 1
Margarita R. Luelsdorff vs. PNGI Charles Town Gaming Limited Liability Company
PA-Terrance L. Britt; J-David Sanders
* Plaintiff claims on April 10, 2011, she fell as a result of an undetectable rise in flooring at the defendant property in Charles Town. She alleges negligence which caused personal injury and seeks an amount to compensate for her injuries as well as any other costs to be determined.
Case number: 12-C-387

Oct. 2
Bank of Charles Town vs. A Wise Solution LLC d/b/a Sears Hometown Store
PA-Stephen G. Skinner; J-David Sanders
* Plaintiff alleges defendant owes at least $35,414.50 for past due credit agreement.
Case number: 12-C-393

Oct. 9
Pride Acquisition LLC vs. James E. Elseroad
PA-Clinton W. Smith; J-David Sanders
* Plaintiff alleges defendant owes at least $44,615.55 for past due credit agreement.
Case number: 12-C-400

Winchester Medical Center vs. Arthur Hamilton
PA-Christopher J. McCarthy; J-David Sanders
* Plaintiff alleges defendant owes at least $21,376.95 for past due credit agreement.
Case number: 12-C-401

Winchester Medical Center vs. James Ballenger
PA-Daniel T. Booth; J-David Sanders
* Plaintiff alleges defendant owes at least $49,694.02 for past due credit agreement.
Case number: 12-C-402

Bakemark vs. Berzaci, Inc.
PA-Daniel T. Booth; J-David Sanders
* Plaintiff alleges defendant owes at least $28,359.07 for past due credit agreement.
Case number: 12-C-403

Clinton Blevins and Iris Delois Blevins vs. Flagstar Bank FSB, Monocacy Home Mortgage LLC, Dan Ryan Builders, Inc. and Jay Kimmel
PA-Andrew C. Skinner; J-David Sanders
* Plaintiffs allege that in January 2007, they purchased a home in the Summit Point area for $450,000. They allege that Dan Ryan affiliated companies gave “savings” which then were used in an exact equal amount for home upgrades. Platinffs allege incentives led to other problems and eventual economic downfall caused loss of job in the home. Plaitiffs allege Flagstar began foreclosure proceedings and would not work with them. The allege misrepresentation, dishonesty, violations of banking statute, fraud, violation of the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act and other charges. Plaintiff seeks damages for each alleged violation and any costs to be determined.
Case number: 12-C-404

Oct. 10
Grasso & Sons Development Corporation vs. New Vision Properties II, Inc. c/o Christopher Shultz and City of Charles Town c/o Joe Costentini
PA-James T. Kratovil; J-David Sanders
* Plaintiff alleges they owned real estate in the Windmill Crossing development which was sold to them by New Vision. They allege the City approved a plat with easements. Plaintiff seeks removal of all liens on the property as a result of the defendants recording of a plat.
Case number: 12-C-405

CIVIL FILINGS: Jefferson County

Oct. 12

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Thelma Davis vs. PNGI Charles Town Gaming LLC, Cosmo Coach Line Ltd. and Connie Amos-Parsons d/b/a At Your Service Events Planner

PA-L. Lee Javins; J-David Sanders

* Plaintiff claims on Nov. 6, 2010, she was a passenger on motor coach visiting the Charles Town casino. Upon exiting the bus, plaintiff alleges she fell because the bus was not parked in the proper disembarkation zone and no staffers from the coach or the casino offered assistance or a temporary step, which she alleges they have in the past. Plaintiff alleges she was injured in the fall due to negligence and seeks judgment against all parties.

Case number: 12-C-408

Jeanette Moran vs. PNGI Charles Town Gaming

PA-L. Lee Javins; J-David Sanders

* Plaintiff alleges that on Nov. 20, 2010, while staying at the hotel adjacent to and owned by PNGI Charles Town Gaming, she rode a shuttle service provided by the casino. Plaintiff alleges she was in a motorized scooter when entering the shuttle and that the driver made no efforts to secure the scooter. Upon a hard brake during the travel, plaintiff alleges the scooter shot forward, she fell from the scooter and sustained physical injury. Plaintiff seeks punitive damages against defendant in an amount to be determined.

Case number: 12-C-409

Evelyn McDonough vs. Jefferson County Council on Aging and Amy Wellman

PA-David Hammer; J-David Sanders

* Plaintiff alleges that she was terminated from employment with the Jefferson County Council on Aging March 16, 2012, following reporting to her supervisor Wellman that she had received indications from her doctor that she potentially was suffering ovarian cancer. Plaintiff alleges motivation for firing violates the West Virginia Human Rights Act. Plaintiff also alleges that defendant did not pay final pay per time constraints outlined by the West Virginia code. Plaintiff sees reinstatement, back pay and any other damages to be determined.

Case number: 12-C-411

Home county turns red, helps send Morrisey to AG’s office

HARPERS FERRY (Legal Newsline) – By comparison, Republican attorney general candidate Patrick Morrisey’s win over incumbent Darrell McGraw Tuesday was a landslide.

Even though he gathered just 51 percent of the vote, Morrisey’s winning margin of 16,314 is larger than McGraw’s previous two combined. McGraw’s 2004 and 2008 victories were two of the closest statewide races in West Virginia history.

One of the counties that turned for Morrisey was his home county of Jefferson, the state’s easternmost county. In fact, partnered with neighbor Berkeley, Morrisey won the tip of the Eastern Panhandle by a combined 12,943 votes.

“Patrick did wage an aggressive campaign. He was all over the state all the time,” said Anne Dungan, the Republican Party chair in Jefferson County. “But the Eastern Panhandle – I don’t know if we’ve ever had an elected official to a statewide office from here.

“I think people in the Eastern Panhandle felt we weren’t represented in Charleston and were also pretty fed up with the corruption in that office. It was just the right time, as far as I can see.”

While Jefferson usually leans more to the left than Berkeley, the county also will be sending a Republican delegate to Charleston – Paul Espinosa – for the first time in many years, Dungan said. Even Mitt Romney gained the majority of votes in Jefferson after the county was one of the few in the state to vote for Barack Obama in 2008.

“I’m hoping this can be a tipping point in getting the Eastern Panhandle better represented, and more Republicans,” Dungan said.

In 2008, Charleston attorney Dan Greear defeated McGraw in Berkeley County by 1,559 votes, while McGraw earned 2,251 more in Jefferson – a total win by 692 for McGraw.

Tuesday, Berkeley voters cast 8,507 more votes for Morrisey than McGraw, and Morrisey won his home county by 4,436.

State GOP chairman Conrad Lucas said the news from Jefferson County is encouraging and noted the importance the region could have in future elections.

“To be successful in a statewide election, you’ll absolutely have to focus time and attention up there,” he said. “It’s a growing area, but a different electorate than candidates are used to.”

Lucas explained that Eastern Panhandlers are much more difficult to target with television advertising because they live in the Washington, D.C., market, and ad time is more expensive. Voters in the area watched expensive battles like Maryland’s Question 7, which legalized table games and a casino at National Harbor, play out during commercial breaks.

“Having a physical presence and strong ground game (in the Eastern Panhandle) is essential for statewide candidates, in particular because buying ads is cost-prohibitive,” Lucas said.

Another county that voted heavily for Morrisey is Wood County, where he won by more than 8,400. That amount is in line with 2008, when Greear won the vote by more than 7,500.

The state’s largest county, Kanawha, favored McGraw by more than 4,000 votes. It was a large turnaround for McGraw, who lost the county by almost the same amount in 2008.

Reach John O’Brien at jobrienwv@gmail.com.

Supreme Court says Jefferson judge didn’t follow directive in previous decision

CHARLESTON – The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has blocked the Jefferson County Circuit Court from forcing the CEO of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Roger Crandall, to be deposed.

“This is the second time this case has been before the Court within the past year on the same issue,” wrote the court, per curiam, on the case that came out of two in a series of retirement plan cases filled against Mass Mutual and others.

The first time the Court heard the case, referred to as MassMutual I, the issue before the court was whether “a high-ranking corporate official who is without any personal or unique knowledge of the facts and circumstances of a case can be compelled to be deposed, despite the availability of other corporate witnesses and other means of discovery.”

The Court adopted the “apex disposition rule” in MassMutual I which states that a party seeking to depose a high-ranking corporate official must show that the official has “unique or personal knowledge” of discoverable information.

If this “unique or personal knowledge” can’t be established, then the circuit court was to issue a protective order and require the seeking party to try and obtain the discovery sought through less intrusive methods.

After sending the case back to the Jefferson court with the issue clarified, “just 14 days after the mandate was issued, the Respondents served amended notices of deposition on the Petitioner.”

The defendants once again filed for a protective order and, as before, Judge David H. Sanders denied their motion, ruling “this court holds that although Plaintiffs have failed to prove Roger Crandall has unique or personal knowledge of the issue outlined above” they had been unable to discover the information they sought, creating the necessity to depose the CEO.

In this case, styled MassMutual II, the Court found the same result as it found in MassMutual I, speaking more directly on the issue this time:

“The circuit court and the Respondents failed to follow the directive of this Court in MassMutual I. Instead, the circuit court agreed with the Respondents very narrow and misguided view of our MassMutual I decision that they did not have to show that Mr. Crandall had unique or personal knowledge, because “[t]he Supreme Court of Appeals simply wants a record…. This Court expected the circuit court and the parties to follow the law set forth in MassMutual I in deciding whether to allow the deposition of Mr. Crandall. The circuit court failed to implement both the letter and the spirit of the mandate issued in MassMutual I, taking into account this Court’s opinion and the circumstances it embraced.”

The Court granted the Writ of Protection, directing the circuit court to enter a protective order prohibiting the deposition of Crandall.

Settlement cancels bifurcated trial over wet floor at 7-11

MARTINSBURG – After a federal judge found that a wet floor on a rainy day could possibly meet a gross negligence standard, a Jefferson County woman and 7-11 have settled her slip-and-fall case.

U.S. District Judge Gina Groh ruled against 7-11’s motion to dismiss Dana Cline’s request for punitive damages on Nov. 9. Cline alleges she suffered a fracture in her ankle, as well as partial tears of various tendons and ligaments, when she slipped inside a Ranson 7-11 on July 1, 2009.

The two sides argued over whether a wet floor on a rainy day constituted gross negligence.

“Taking the Plaintiff’s allegations as true, however, the Court concludes that the Plaintiff has made sufficient allegations of gross negligence to survive the Defendant’s motion to dismiss,” Groh wrote.

“The Plaintiff has alleged that the Defendant knew or had reason to know that wet floors in its business created dangerous and hazardous conditions, that the Defendant knew or had reason to know that the failure to place mats on the floor to protect customers from slipping when the floor was wet caused dangerous and hazardous conditions, and that the Defendant knew or had reason to know that the failure to place cones or warning signs near the door when the floor was wet caused dangerous and hazardous conditions.

“The difference between ordinary negligence and gross negligence is one of degree and, thus, constitutes a question for the trier-of-fact.”

According to the case’s docket, the case was settled in the weeks after Groh’s ruling. She entered an order dismissing the case on Nov. 26. The settlement amount is not available.

A final pretrial conference was scheduled for Nov. 30.

Groh had granted 7-11’s request to bifurcate the trial. The first phase would have determined if 7-11 was liable to Cline for compensatory damages, the amount of compensatory damages awarded and if the misconduct attributed to 7-11 would have met the threshold for imposition of punitive damages.

If the jury had ruled that it met that threshold, a second phase of the trial to determine the amount of punitive damages would have been ordered.

Cline did not contest 7-11’s desire to bifurcate the trial. If a second phase had happened, the plaintiff could have introduced evidence of 7-11’s financial condition.

Groh wrote that West Virginia law does not require bifurcation, but precedent exists. A 2002 ruling by the state Supreme Court in a case against Wal-Mart upheld a trial court’s bifurcation of a punitive damages issue in an identical manner to 7-11’s request.

7-11 had argued it would be prejudicial to introduce evidence of its assets or net worth unless it was decided its conduct warranted punitive damages.

Groh also denied Cline’s motion for partial summary judgment as to liability on the part of 7-11. She wrote that the motion can be denied because it was untimely filed, but also said it should be denied considering the substance of Cline’s argument.

The two sides disputed whether there was water on the vinyl floor of the store, how much it had rained that day and whether there was a sign warning customers about a slippery floor.

Representing Cline was the Law Office of F. Samuel Byrer in Charles Town.

New Eastern Panhandle circuit judge to take office Friday

CHARLES TOWN – Michael Douglas Lorensen will be sworn in as West Virginia’s newest circuit judge in a brief ceremony on Dec. 14 at 10 a.m. in the second floor courtroom of the Jefferson County Courthouse.

Lorensen will begin work that day as a judge for the Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit, which covers Berkeley, Jefferson and Morgan counties.

Chief Circuit Judge David H. Sanders will conduct the oath of office.

A public investiture ceremony will be held on Jan. 10 at 4 p.m. at the Berkeley County Judicial Center in Martinsburg.

Circuit Judge Christopher C. Wilkes will conduct the oath of office in that ceremony.

A public ceremony also will be scheduled at a later date in Morgan County.

Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin appointed Lorensen on Nov. 16 to fill a vacancy created earlier this year when Judge Gina Groh was named to the federal bench in the Northern District of West Virginia.

Lorensen is a partner at Bowles Rice in Martinsburg. He was a reporter at The Dominion Post in Morgantown before he attended West Virginia University College of Law.

Lorensen is a former law clerk to U.S. District Judge Charles Haden II and is a current member of the West Virginia Judicial Hearing Board.

He is a former president and board member of the Shenandoah Community Health Center.


Racketeering claims made in federal suits against Mountain State University

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Part of the Mountain State University campus located inside the Martinsburg Mall

Part of the Mountain State University campus located inside the Martinsburg Mall

MARTINSBURG – Several more lawsuits have been filed in federal court against Mountain State University over its alleged failure to inform students of the school’s accreditation issues.

The federal lawsuits against Mountain State and former university president Charles Polk differ from many of those filed in state courts. The federal lawsuits – which also name MSU Building Company, MSU Foundation and MSU Endowment Fund as defendants – allege racketeering.

“Defendants were engaged in a widespread criminal enterprise consisting of a pattern of racketeering activity and a conspiracy to engage in racketeering activity involving numerous racketeering acts during the past 10 calendar years,” a complaint filed Dec. 10 says.

“The predicate acts alleged herein include mail fraud and wire fraud. These acts were not isolated events, but rather part of an overall conspiracy and pattern of racketeering activity.”

The complaints say Polk was the leader of the MSU Enterprise and controlled the racketeering activity. It also says Polk’s salary in 2009 was more than $1.8 million – a figure that represented approximately 3.5 percent of the school’s annual budget. That was the highest percentage received by a president from a private university’s budget in 2009, the suit says.

Lawsuits filed against Mountain State allege students who were admitted to the nursing program were informed it was accredited by National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission and West Virginia Board of Examiners for Registered Professional Nurses, but later discovered the nursing program did not have full accreditation status.

In 2008, the NLNAC voted to place the nursing program at MSU on warning and scheduled the next evaluation visit for spring 2010.

After the spring 2010 visit by the NLNAC, the commission voted to deny continuing accreditation to the BSN program, and the defendants failed to inform the students of the accreditation denial and encouraged them to continue paying for and participating in the program, according to the suits.

The lawsuits claim that on Nov. 12, 2010, the West Virginia Board of Examiners for Registered Professional Nurses voted unanimously to require that MSU’s BSN program cease and desist all admissions to all nursing programs/pathways or any other program representing progression toward a nursing degree for a minimum of 15 months.

The defendants were allegedly negligent in keeping the students informed and breached the contract with the plaintiffs by failing to provide the education opportunity promised.

On Aug. 1, the University of Charleston announced it is taking over Mountain State University’s campuses in Beckley and Martinsburg.

Fourteen lawsuits filed in Jefferson County Circuit Court on Aug. 6 alleged a widespread criminal enterprise and racketeering activity. They were removed to federal court in Martinsburg on Sept. 20.

From Dec. 4-10, another 19 racketeering lawsuits were filed against the university and Polk by attorney Sherman Lambert, Sr. of Shepherdstown.

The Skinner Law Firm of Charles Town filed the original 14 racketeering lawsuits. The complaints filed by the two firms are largely the same.

They take issue with two books co-authored by Polk – “the only books ever published by the Mountain State University Press.

One book, titled “Apex Thinking,” is a “playbook” for Polk’s alleged racketeering, the plaintiffs say. The complaints quote the following passages from the book:

-“(S)ometimes the deliberate misuse of power becomes the only way to survive…”;

-“While power, per se is neither positive or negative, certain situations necessitate its deliberate negative application.”;

-“It is an age old story: Everyone who reaches the top, sooner or later will find themselves challenged with their backs against the proverbial wall. It is then that apex thinkers conclude their own survival is more important than the ethical or non-ethical use of power.”;

-“There are times when it is essential to skew information so that (it) creates a desired impression. If that’s lying then one may have to lie a ‘little bit.’”; and

-“(T)he best scapegoat technique is to pass blame along to some abstract agency or organization.”

As for the racketeering claims, the complaint says each of the defendants has been associated with the Mountain State Enterprise and aided and abetted its actions.

“The defendants engaged in schemes to defraud MSU nursing students through mail and wire fraud regarding accreditation status of the nursing program,” the complaints say.

“At all times the plaintiff applied to, was accepted and attended MSU, the MSU Enterprise was aware that the nursing program was unstable, and that the loss of accreditation was imminent.

“Nonetheless, the MSU Enterprise continued to assure students that nursing program was stable and assured Plaintiff to continue taking out the maximum amount for student loans. When Plaintiff called MSU, they heard a recording that said, ‘Welcome to Mountain State, your fully accredited hometown university.’ However, nobody returned Plaintiff’s telephone calls.”

The Skinner Law Firm has filed a motion to remand its suits back to state court. Though the complaints contain claims made under the federal racketeering law, the Skinner firm says the majority of claims are grounded in state law.

The complaints also make conspiracy, fraud and breach of contract claims, as well as a claim under the West Virginia Consumer Credit Protection Act.

Justice Benjamin: Opinion in car wreck case went too far

CHARLESTON – In a written concurrence released Dec. 7, Justice Brent Benjamin took issue with the advisory opinion style of the Supreme Court’s reversal and remand of a grant of summary judgment in a car accident case that resulted in the death of a teen.

“Essentially the majority sets forth, unnecessarily, a course by which the petitioner could be deemed responsible for the wrongful death of Samantha Nichole Dawn Staubs,” Benjamin wrote.

“Prejudging foreseeability and intervening causation is simply not within the proper province of this Court at this point in the proceedings.”

The case involved a car accident which took the life of 14-year old Samantha Staubs and seriously injured her sister, 13-year old Jessica Staubs. Presiding was Jefferson County Circuit Court Judge David H. Sanders.

The two girls were passengers in a vehicle stolen and driven by another 14-year old girl who was intoxicated, according to court records.

18-year-old Jonathan Ray Marcus had driven Samantha and her friend Kelly, along with 26-year old Steven Woodward and his younger brother to a store where alcohol was purchased.

There was conflicting testimony as to how the girls ended up with the alcohol that Woodward purchased but it was “undisputed that [Marcus] did not exit the vehicle or purchase any alcohol.”

After the alcohol purchase, the two girls met up with several others girls, including Samantha’s sister Jessica and their friend Misty, at their friend Adrian’s house, where the alcohol was consumed.

There was testimony that later in the evening one of the girls may have called Marcus, along with several others, when trying to find a ride home.

According to court records, after being unable to find a ride, “Misty and Samantha left Adrian’s house stating they were going to steal a car.”

“They returned minutes later with a truck they stole from neighbor Mack Jenkins and retrieved Kelly and Jessica. Minutes later, with Misty at the wheel and Samantha an unsecured front passenger, the vehicle hit an embankment. Samantha was killed; Jessica sustained a head injury,” the majority opinion says.

After a lawsuit alleging negligence was filed against Marcus by Lori Ann Staubs, the mother of the Staubs sisters, Sanders granted Mrs. Staubs’ motion for summary judgment.

The trial court made several findings, including “that by refusing to pick the girls up later in the evening at their request, he was guilty of common law negligence” and “that Misty’s actions in stealing the vehicle, driving without a license, and driving intoxicated were not intervening causes.”

On appeal, the state Supreme Court found “the trial court’s award of summary judgment improperly invaded the province of the fact-finder” on numerous issues raised by Marcus.

“A trial court is not permitted to ‘try’ a case under the auspices of summary judgment for reasons that are best demonstrated by the unfortunate convolution of issues presented herein,” the majority opinion says.

The Court reversed the trial court and remanded the case back for further proceedings.

Benjamin, while agreeing with the result, disagreed with the style of the opinion.

“I write separately raising concern that the majority opinion, which reaches a satisfactory result in remanding this case for further development of the facts, has risen to the level of an advisory opinion,” he wrote.

“This is apparent from phrases such as ‘these factual issues notwithstanding, we do find that ample legal authority existed to form a potential basis of liability of petitioner,’ and the ‘proper management of the legal and factual issues presented.’

“While I agree with the result reached, I believe that the majority opinion goes beyond what is necessary and proper for this Court to do in deciding the issue before us.”

Charles Town false arrest suit filed by Haitian immigrants settled

MARTINSBURG – The lawsuit filed by two Haitian immigrants claiming they were mistakenly arrested by Charles Town police last year has come to a close.

U.S. District Judge John Preston Bailey on Dec. 3 ordered the dismissal of Indony and Drix Jean Baptiste’s lawsuit against the city of Charles Town after the sides announced two weeks earlier they reached a settlement through mediation. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed.

When contacted, Harry P. Waddell, the Baptistes’ attorney, said he could not discuss the settlement due to a confidentiality agreement. The city did not respond by presstime to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by The West Virginia Record for the terms.

According to the suit, Indony accompanied Drix from their home in Ranson to Charles Town on March 30, 2011, to meet Drix’s fiancé at the Jefferson County courthouse. After he and his fiancé applied for a marriage license, Drix went with Indony to the library to await his fiancé’s return from the Division of Motor Vehicles.

While on the computers in one part of the library, Indony heard Drix cry for help from another part. Upon locating his brother, Indony said he found Drix being questioned by Charles Town Police officers James E. Knott, Jonathan T. DeSarno and Jason W. Newlin.

At that point, the suit claimed Indony intervened, informing the officers Drix could understand but not speak English. Though both claim they cooperated with all their requests, including providing identification, Drix and Indony were eventually placed under arrest and taken to the CTPD station in separate cruisers.

According to the suit, upon arrival at the station, Drix was placed in a holding cell while Indony was chained to a chair and questioned by Detective Ronald Kearns. After answering some initial questions, Indony refused to answer any more until both he and Drix were informed why they were arrested.

Kearns said they were not under arrest. Instead, he informed Indony they were brought to the station because a black man they saw arrested when on their way to the Post Office after leaving the courthouse was accused of refusing to answer questions about an unspecified crime, they claim.

About the time of the arrest, the lawsuit alleges Kearns said the manager of the Bank of Charles Town saw Indony and Drix in the vicinity and “thought you two were the guy.”

Before they could be released, Kearns told Drix and Indony they would have to be photographed and fingerprinted. After being detained for two hours, the suit says they were released and taken to their car, which was towed to the station’s parking lot after it was searched.

Knott, Kearns, DeSarno and Newlin were named as co-defendants in the suit.

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, case number 11-cv-73

CIVIL FILINGS: Jefferson County

Nov. 9

Jess Reed, Attorney-in-fact for William Reed and Naomi Reed vs. David R. Zimmerman and Cathern Zimmerman
PA-J. Michael Cassell J-David Sanders
* Plaintiff alleges that defendant conveyed to plaintiffs a parcel of real estate in 1988 with non-exclusive right-of-access. Defendant allegedly locked a gate across that access which violated deed. Plaintff seeks declaratory relief for breach of contract, violation of right-to-access, and also seeks injunction against defendant to prohibit interference with access and damages of $50,000.
Case Number: 12-C-462

 

Building code lawsuit against Shepherdstown dismissed

MARTINSBURG – United States District Judge Gina M. Groh has dismissed a constitutional claim brought by husband and wife plaintiffs against the town of Shepherdstown because all of the state claims on which the federal claim depended had already been dismissed.

Donald and Patricia Burgess had originally filed suit in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County on Nov. 7, 2011, seeking relief for alleged improper enactment and enforcement of the building code of the Corporation of Shepherdstown.

The petition contained seven counts, as described in the opinion:

“Count I seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Respondents to permit the Petitioners to complete renovations on property within the corporate boundary, to remove a section from the Codified Ordinances, and to revoke any authority to administer a section of the building code.

“Count II seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the issuance of a building permit. Count III seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Corporation of Shepherdstown to issue written confirmation that the subject property is exempt from the business license requirement.

“Count IV seeks a writ of mandamus compelling issuance of a business license. Count V seeks a writ of prohibition prohibiting the Corporation of Shepherdstown from enforcing the zoning ordinance on the basis that the same was improperly adopted.

“Count VI seeks an injunction and a writ of mandamus requiring the Corporation of Shepherdstown to prohibit the destruction or deletion of e-mails, require disclosure of certain e-mails, and require compliance with a state law freedom of information act request.

“Count VII contains a claim under 42 U.S.C. §1983, and is the only claim for which a jury trial is demanded.”

Because of the §1983 claim, the city removed the case to federal court. Groh found that the state law issues “clearly predominate over the §1983 claim, which is wholly dependent upon a favorable ruling on the state law claims,” and it remanded Counts I-VI back to the state court.

On June 15 and June 22, the circuit court conducted an evidentiary hearing on those claims, denied the relief requested, and dismissed with prejudice Counts I-VI of the Petition.

A subsequent motion for a new trial was denied by the circuit court on Sept. 18, and the city then moved the federal court to dismiss the only remaining count, Count VII.

Groh wrote, “The Petitioners’ §1983 claim is completely premised on the Petitioners’ six state law claims. In Count VII of their Petition, the Petitioners allege that “[p]ursuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the Petitioners are entitled to due process before they can be deprived of their… property interests, which due process they have been denied.

“However, the extent of the Petitioners’ property interests was determined by the state court, which dismissed the Petitioners’ claims. Without a finding in the Petitioners’ favor on the issue of property interests, the Petitioners cannot prevail on their federal due process claim. There is simply no way for the Court to decide these matters without relitigating issues already decided by the state court.

“Such being the case, the Court finds that the Petitioners’ remaining §1983 claim must be dismissed at this time. All of the underlying state law claims on which the Petitioners’ §1983 claim is premised have been dismissed with prejudice by a state court having jurisdiction of both the subject matter and the parties.”

CIVIL FILINGS: Jefferson County

Dec. 14
Gregory Hall vs. Thomas E. Delaney
PA-Pro Se; J-David Sanders
*Plaintiff claims defendant failed to provide adequate legal support regarding a Dec. 27, 2011, warrantless search and seizure that violated plaintiff’s civil rights. Plaintiff claims defendant maliciously misrepresented plaintiff and seeks $100,000,000 in damages.
Case Number: 12-C-485

Dec. 17
Winchester Medical Center vs. Denise Ford
PA-Daniel T. Booth; J-David Sanders
*Plaintiff claims defendant owes at least $63,002.89 for past due credit agreement.
Case Number: 12-C-489

Dec. 17
84 Lumber L.P vs. Sandra Drosdak-Hilmes
PA-Amie M. Mihalko; J-David Sanders
*Plaintff claims defendant owes at least $38,090.77 for past due credit agreement.
Case Number: 12-C-490

Haitian immigrants get $60K from civil rights suit

CHARLESTON – Records show an eastern panhandle municipality paid $60,000 to two Haitian immigrants who accused four of its officers of civil rights violations.

Last month, Indony and Drix Jean Baptistes’ lawsuit against the city of Charles Town, Sgt. James E. Knott, Detective Ronald E. Kerns, Senior Patrolman Jonathan Desarno and Jason Newlin was dismissed after the sides announced they reached a settlement through mediation. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed in court records.

However, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by the West Virginia Record, the city disclosed it agreed to pay Indony and Drix $30,000 each. As a condition of accepting the settlement, they agreed “to refrain from otherwise publishing the details… to other third parties.”

Also, the city made the payout through its insurance carrier, Trident Insurance Services, without admitting any liability.

In their suit, the Baptistes, who are brothers, alleged after meeting Drix’s fiancé at the courthouse and running some errands on March 30, 2011, they went to the library to await the fiancé’s return from the Division of Motor Vehicles. After hearing Drix cry for help, Indony found him being questioned by Knott, DeSarno and Newlin.

Despite cooperating with all their requests, including providing identification, Drix and Indony allege they were eventually placed under arrest and taken to the CTPD station in separate cruisers. Upon arrival at the station, Drix was placed in a holding cell while Indony was chained to a chair and questioned by Kearns, they said.

After answering some initial questions, Indony refused to answer any more until both he and Drix were informed why they were arrested.

Kearns said they were not under arrest. Instead, he informed Indony they were brought to the station because a black man they saw arrested when on their way to the Post Office after leaving the courthouse was accused of refusing to answer questions about an unspecified crime, the brothers say.

About the time of the arrest, the lawsuit alleges Kearns said the manager of the Bank of Charles Town saw Indony and Drix in the vicinity and “thought you two were the guy.”

Before they could be released, Kearns allegedly told Drix and Indony they would have to be photographed and fingerprinted. After being detained for two hours, the suit says they were released and taken to their car, which was towed to the station’s parking lot after it was searched.

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia (Martinsburg), case number 11-cv-73


McGraw’s title loans case remanded to Jefferson court

MARTINSBURG – One of the lawsuits new state Attorney General Patrick Morrisey has inherited from his predecessor will be heard in his home county.

On Jan. 11, U.S. District Judge Gina Groh remanded former AG Darrell McGraw’s lawsuit against a Virginia-based title loan company to state court in Jefferson County. Morrisey, of Harpers Ferry, defeated McGraw in the November general election.

McGraw sued Fast Auto Loans of Virginia, Community Loans of America of Georgia and Robert Reich – the president and CEO of both – in June, alleging illegal debt collection practices.

Companies that engage in title loans offer loans while placing a lien on the borrower’s vehicle.

Fast Auto Loans said the question of whether McGraw had the authority under the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act to enjoin the company from making loans in Virginia to West Virginia residents depends entirely on the federal Commerce Clause.

“(T)he court finds that to the extent the defendants seek to argue that the relief sought by the plaintiff conflicts with the Commerce Clause, such an argument merely constitutes a federal defense to the plaintiff’s complaint, which is not grounds for removal,” Groh wrote, citing a 2009 decision in McGraw’s case against CashCall.

“A defense to the plaintiff’s sought-after injunction, even a defense which is based upon federal law, is an issue that can and should ordinarily be raised in state court. After all, state courts ‘are presumed competent to resolve federal issues,’ and ‘ when a state proceeding presents a federal issue, even a preemption issue, the proper course is to seek resolution of that issue by the state court.’”

Groh wrote that any federal question that might have existed was rendered moot by the vacation of a state court injunction.

In July, Jefferson County Circuit Court Judge David Sanders entered a temporary injunction that ordered Fast Auto Loans to stop collecting payments, seizing vehicles and entering into new loans with West Virginia residents.

Groh noted the injunction was entered without a hearing on the issue. When Fast Auto Loans removed the case to federal court in July, it moved to stay and declare void the circuit court’s injunction.

The parties stipulated to an entry of an order that vacated the injunction. Fast Auto Loans agreed to voluntarily discontinue making loans to West Virginians.

McGraw’s first lawsuit against Fast Auto Loans sought to enforce a subpoena sent to the company. He filed it in April 2011.

Kanawha County Circuit Court Judge Charles King ruled the subpoena was procedurally defective after Fast Auto Loans argued McGraw ignored procedural requirements for the issuance of an out-of-state subpoena.

McGraw did not directly appeal to the state Supreme Court. Instead, he filed a petition for writ of prohibition.

The court denied the request and said McGraw should have filed a direct appeal. His lawsuit followed months later.

From the West Virginia Record: Reach John O’Brien at jobrienwv@gmail.com.

CIVIL FILINGS: Jefferson County

Dec. 26
Winchester Medical Center vs. Ralph Edward Luria
PA-Christopher J. McCarthy; J-David Sanders
*Plaintiff claims defendant owes at least $27,639.14 for past credit agreement.
Case Number: 12-C-498

Dec. 28
Luther Nutter vs. City of Charles Town
PA-Christooher P. Stroech; J-David Sanders
*Plaintiff alleges negligence on the part of the defendant, claiming that through an inadequate sewer system that he has lost value in his personal property and home. Plaintiff alleges trespass via raw sewage that entered his home. Plaintiff seeks damages to be determined at trial.
Case Number: 12-C-500

Dec. 28
Mary Luani vs. City of Charles Town
PA-J. Christopher P. Stroech; J-David Sanders
*Plaintiff alleges negligence on the part of the defendant through inadequate sewer system, claiming that she has lost value in her personal property and home. Plaintiff alleges trespass via raw sewage that entered her home. Plaintiff seeks damages to be determined at trial.
Case Number: 12-C-501

Jan. 7
Jefferson Security Bank vs. Kevin N. Boutin and Nancy L. Cox
PA-Kathy M. Santa Barbara; J-Michael Lorensen
*Plaintiff claims defendant owes at least $352,644.92 for past credit agreement.
Case Number: 13-C-13

Jan. 11
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company vs. Tetra-Con LLC
PA-Ryan Marstellter; J-Michael Lorensen
*Plaintiff alleges that that in May, Defendant caused extensive water damage via work done to a home owned by the insured, Everett Ehrlich. The insured filed a claim with the plaintiff, which the plaintiff paid. Plaintiff now seeks judgment against Defendant for the amount of claim totaling $38,342.21, as well as for other costs to be determined at trial.
Case Number: 13-C-17

Jefferson County sheriff resigns, pleads guilty

CHARLES TOWN – An Eastern Panhandle sheriff has decided to throw in the towel on both his law enforcement career and fight with the federal government and admit he violated a bank robbery suspect’s civil rights.

Robert “Bobby” Shirley on Jan. 11 tendered his resignation as Jefferson County sheriff in a one-sentence letter addressed to Commission President Patsy Noland. Records show the resignation came the same day Shirley, 61, formally accepted a plea agreement offered by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in a pending indictment against him for violating Mark Daniel Haines’ civil rights.

In June, a federal grand jury indicted Shirley on charges relating to his arrest of Haines 18 months earlier. According to both the indictment and a related civil suit Haines filed, Shirley recklessly beat and kicked Haines following a high-speed chase on Dec. 27, 2010.

Shirley and deputies with the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Department began their chase of Haines after receiving a report he attempted to rob the drive-thru of the City National Bank at the Potomac Marketplace shopping center in Ranson. Eventually, officers with the Charles Town and Ranson police departments joined in and were later followed by the Berkeley County Sheriff’s Department and the West Virginia State Police.

After Haines stopped his pick-up truck in a field across from Files Cross Road, he stepped out of the vehicle with his hands in the air. After one or more of the officers pushed him against the bed of truck, Shirley “climbed into the bed… and kicked [him] repeatedly in the head with a deliberate and sadistic intention to inflict injury on [him],” it is alleged.

The indictment charged Shirley with deprivation of rights under the color of law and destruction, altercation or falsification of records in a federal investigation. After pleading not guilty to the charges at his arraignment, Shirley was released on a $15,000 unsecured bond that included a travel restriction to the northern district and was prohibited from carrying a firearm.

In exchange for pleading guilty to the civil rights charge, and, among other things, agreeing to offer truthful information to further demands for information, Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Camiletti offered to dismiss the falsification charge. Shirley’s attorney, Kevin D. Mills, said the offer would be accepted with the stipulation Shirley be allowed to tender his resignation and he remain free on bond pending sentencing subject to electronic monitoring.

U.S. Magistrate Judge David J. Joel on Jan. 14 accepted Shirley’s change of plea and delayed sentencing pending a pre-sentence investigation by the U.S. Probation Office. The next day, he placed Shirley under home confinement.

A trial was originally scheduled for Jan. 22. On the civil rights charge, Shirley faces up to 10 years in prison, followed by three years supervised release and a $250,000 fine.

Originally, the Commission planned to fill Shirley’s vacancy after interviewing three candidates selected by the county Democratic Executive Committee. However, it later announced it would advertise for the position as it would any other job vacancy.

The replacement would fill Shirley’s vacancy until next election in 2014. In meantime, the commission appointed Chief Deputy Jesse Jones as acting sheriff.

Prior to the plea agreement, Harry P. Waddell, Haines’ attorney, filed an amended complaint in the civil suit against Shirley. In it, he identified, and named as co-defendants nine of the previously 14 John Doe officers who aided Shirley in arresting Haines.

They are JCSD deputies Joseph Forman and Terry Palmer, BCSD deputies J.H. Jenkins, C. Merson, Corey Welcome and T.A. Sherman, Ranson Police Department Lt. Charles Lynch, Charles Town Police Dept Sgt. W. M. Spessert and Trooper Joseph Bush.

Along with their answer filed Dec. 27 in which they deny Haines’ allegations, Forman and Palmer filed a counterclaim seeking recovery of attorneys fees and expenses. They are represented by Jonathan Tyler Mayhew and Joseph L. Caltrider with Bowles, Rice, McDavid, Graff and Love.

Last May, Haines, 42, was sentenced to 19 years in prison after pleading guilty to an earlier robbery of a BB&T branch in Martinsburg. In September, he plead guilty in U.S. District Court to attempting to escape from the Eastern Regional Jail while awaiting sentencing on the robbery charge.

Currently, he is incarcerated at the Allegheny County Detention Center near Cumberland, Md.

Trial in the civil suit is tentatively scheduled for Nov. 19 before Judge John Preston Bailey.

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, case number 12-cr-46 (Shirley criminal) and 12-cr-51 (Shirley civil)

State High Court grants writ to Jefferson sheriff in deputy’s termination case

CHARLESTON – In spite of his recent guilty plea to civil rights violations, former Jefferson County Sheriff Robert “Bobby” Shirley can take consolation in a small legal victory in a former deputy’s pending wrongful termination case.

On Jan. 11, the day he tendered his resignation as part of plea agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the state Supreme Court voted unanimously not to rehear arguments in Shirley’s writ of prohibition against Jefferson Circuit Judge David Sanders and former JCSD Sgt. Michael T. Dodson. Three months earlier, the court in a memorandum opinion unanimously ruled Sanders abused his discretion a year ago in appointing members to pre-disciplinary hearing panel to properly consider Shirley’s 2009 firing of Dodson.

Fifteen months earlier the court remanded the case to Sanders after it ruled he erred in upholding the county Deputy Sheriff’s Civil Service Commission’s decision finding in Dodson’s favor since Shirley failed to follow state law in giving Dodson the required pre-disciplinary hearing.

Memorandum opinions are issued by the court in cases that would not be significantly aided by oral arguments and present no new or significant questions of law.

According to court records, Dodson, who first became a deputy in 2002, was fired on Jan. 6, 2009, following an investigation into an alleged romantic relationship with Cpl. Tracey Edwards, a detective. Dodson’s termination was among Shirley’s first acts after taking office in this first term as sheriff.

The investigation into Dodson’s relationship with Edwards started in June 2008. According to court records, he accused Edwards of improperly giving a suspect legal advice after she apparently told him his civil rights may have been violated following an unspecified incident on Allstadt Hill Road in Harpers Ferry.

In response to the complaint he filed against her, Edwards admitted to the relationship. The investigation alleged that on several occasions between 2005 and 2007, they had sex in Edwards’ cruiser, her office and a park near the sheriff’s office when either one or both were on duty.

After then-Sheriff Edward Boober informed him disciplinary action would be taken, Dodson requested in writing a pre-disciplinary hearing. A month before the Nov. 5, 2008, hearing, Boober asked that one of the panel members, Cpl. K. Boyce, be recused since he was the one who investigated Dodson’s allegations against Edwards.

According to court records, the panel, on the day of the hearing, granted Boober’s request to have Boyce recused. It adjourned the hearing, deciding not to hear the matter until the Jefferson County Deputy Sheriff’s Association appointed a replacement for Boyce.

DSA never appointed a replacement. After Shirley fired him, Dodson appealed the decision to the Commission, which upheld it.

In a unanimous two-page memorandum opinion, the court on Sept. 23, 2011, reversed Sanders’ ruling upholding the Commission’s decision saying state law is clear in “that a civil service police officer be afforded a predisciplinary hearing prior to his/her discharge from employment.” Along with reversing his decision, the court remanded the case back to Sanders with instructions Dodson be given a proper pre-disciplinary hearing.

After the case was remanded, on a date not specified, Shirley convened a hearing board. Before it could meet, Dodson filed an injunction alleging it was improperly constituted.

Dodson alleged various “improprieties” in the board’s membership that included, among other things, Shirley’s “undue influence over the DSA’s appointment of its representative to the board because of the involvement of the Sheriff’s administrative assistant in counting the DSA’s voting ballots and because of the department’s chief deputy’s involvement in the DSA’s vote.” Also, he maintained DSA had not held a formal meeting for the past five years.

After holding a hearing on Dodson’s injunction, Sanders asked both Shirley and Dodson to each provide him the names of five people they wanted to serve on the board. From those lists, Sanders chose three names each to comprise a six-member board.

When Sanders refused to allow him to select at least member as his representative, Shirley filed his writ with the court.

In its Oct. 19 opinion, the court said while the chief circuit judge has some discretion in appointing members to the board it is “only [emphasis in the original] ‘in the event one or more members of the board cannot be appointed as otherwise provided [by state law].’” Despite the fact, DSA hadn’t meet in over five years and Shirley’s administrative assistant aided in counting votes, the court found Dodson’s arguments unpersuasive they in any way tainted the process in which DSA selected a board member.

“There is no evidence that the DSA,” the court said, “as an organization, or that its voting process, or that the help it received from the Sheriff’s administrative assistant, had any improper effect on the DSA’s choice of its representative on the board.”

“ Thus, it is clear that the circuit court was incorrect when it determined that the DSA was unable to appoint a member of the board.”

West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, case numbers 35699 (Dodson administrative appeal) and 12-0586 (Shirley writ of prohibition)

Shirley the third recent sheriff to admit guilt

CHARLES TOWN – Robert “Bobby” Shirley’s recent guilty plea to civil rights violations is the third time in a year a sheriff has admitted to criminal misconduct.

In January 2012, then-Lincoln County Sheriff Jerry Bowman was indicted in U.S. District Court on a count of information of conspiracy against rights of citizens. The charge was the result of a joint investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District and the West Virginia Secretary of State’s Office into voter fraud in Lincoln County.

The indictment accused Bowman of falsifying more than 100 absentee ballots in the May 2010 Democratic primary that benefited not only his campaign for circuit clerk, but Donald Whitten’s re-election effort as county clerk. Separately, Whitten was indicted on a count of information of fraud.

In pleading guilty, Bowman, 58, agreed to resign as sheriff and never run for elective office again. Judge Thomas E. Johnston on Sept. 5 sentenced Bowman to a year and a day in prison and fined him $5,100.

Currently, he is incarcerated at the Federal Corrections Institution-Schuylkill in Minersville, Pa.

Also that January, the Mason County grand jury returned a 38-count indictment against then-Sheriff David Anthony II for unrelated fraud and firearms charges stemming from using public funds to take a personal trip to Florida, and discharging a handgun over his son’s head. In March, Anthony, 42, agreed to plead guilty to charges of brandishing and shooting near a dwelling and no contest to charges of fraudulent scheme and embezzlement, all misdemeanors.

In exchange for his guilty plea, Anthony, who was facing removal from office on a petition filed by the Mason County Commission, agreed to resign from office immediately, withdraw his candidacy for re-election, surrender his law enforcement certification and publically apologize for his actions. In May, Judge David W. Nibert sentenced Anthony to 18 months in jail, and fined him $500.

Currently, he is incarcerated at the Southwestern Regional Jail near Holden in Logan County.

Shirley’s guilty plea, and subsequent resignation, brings to an end a 32-year career in law enforcement. Shirley became a deputy sheriff in 1981 and worked his way to the rank of lieutenant before retiring in 2006.

Shortly after retiring Shirley became lead supervisor for security at the U.S. Customs Border and Protection Advanced Training Center in Harpers Ferry. In 2008, Shirley successfully defeated his Republican opponent, James E. Watson III, in the open race for sheriff.

That year, then-Sheriff Everett Boober was constitutionally prohibited from seeking a third successive term and unsuccessfully ran for assessor. In May’s primary election, Shirley foiled Boober’s attempt at a political comeback by defeating him, 2,224 to 1,227.

In spite of the indictment, Shirley narrowly defeated his GOP challenger, Earl Ballenger, also a retired JSCD deputy, in November’s general election, 50.71 to 48.78

Viewing all 353 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>